University
of Washington Office of the
President, Box 351230
June 15, 2001
UW Community
Dear Colleagues:
In
January, 2001, Faculty Senate Chair Mary Coney and I convened and charged a
committee to review the University Initiatives Fund (UIF). This committee, chaired by Dean Nancy
Hooyman, thoroughly and intensively examined all aspects of the UIF. Their report, available on the web at
http://www.washington.edu/uif/, was distributed to the campus leaders on April
30, with a request for comments.
The
UIF Review Committee report examined the rationale behind the UIF, the split of
the fund into its interdisciplinary and unit-specific parts, the ways in which
the cuts were taken to provide the funds for reallocation, the process by which
award decisions were made, and the degree of understanding and knowledge of the
UIF throughout the University community.
I am pleased to accept the Review Committee’s recommendations in full.
The
Committee reaffirmed the rationale behind the UIF as a fund for
interdisciplinary innovation and were impressed by its transformative
impact. The Committee further
acknowledged the relationship between innovation and excellence so critical to
a University of this caliber. Their
assessment adds an important perspective as the UW moves toward a future of
even greater contribution and stature.
The
Committee’s enthusiasm for the interdisciplinary portion of the UIF (0.6%) was
in clear contrast to its lack of enthusiasm for the unit-specific portion of
the UIF (0.4%). Although I find the
latter disappointing, I accept their evaluation that, while one part of the
experiment has been a success and should be continued permanently, the other
has not realized its promise, and should be discontinued as a University-wide
initiative.
The
Committee was less sanguine about the method by which the UIF is funded. They note that three biennia of one-percent
cuts have resulted in negative consequences throughout campus. They urge that the levy of 0.6% on unit
operating budgets be replaced gradually by other sources of funding, including,
but not limited to private donations, endowment funding, state funds, and
tuition. Provost Lee Huntsman and I
believe that we can accomplish this goal, and will make this a priority as we
go forward.
The
Academic and Student Affairs Committee of the Board of Regents discussed the
UIF Review Committee report at their June 9, 2001 meeting. They expressed very strong support for
maintaining the interdisciplinary UIF in the biennia ahead, at least at the
0.6% level, and preferably the 1.0% level.
They indicated that they expect the President and the Provost to achieve
this goal.
The
review uncovered uneven knowledge of the UIF among faculty, staff, and
students, and encouraged heightened attention to process and information
dissemination. Some UIF projects have
been exemplary in outreach and publicity, while others have been less so. The administration has communicated
effectively about some but not all aspects of the UIF. There has been some
attempt to align goals of UIF proposals with long-range plans of units and the
University, but this alignment should become more systematic. We will take seriously these and other
process recommendations and will implement changes immediately.
I
am grateful for the UIF Review Committee’s outstanding recommendations. I would also like to note the exceptional
work of the nine review committees charged to evaluate specific UIF projects
funded in 1997. Their evaluations and
recommendations helped the UIF Review Committee in its work, and contributed,
no doubt, to the Committee’s sense that, “We are uniformly impressed by the
excellence of the proposals funded and commend them for their transformative
impact and critical role in creating a ‘culture of possibilities.’ ”
The
UIF’s strengths notwithstanding, the UW is facing very difficult choices in the
biennium ahead. Provost Huntsman and I
have asked each of the consultative bodies—the Senate Committee on Planning and
Budgeting, the University Budget Committee, the President’s Cabinet, and
others—to advise us on budgetary tradeoffs and priorities. While the 0.6% investment for the UIF in
2001-03 appears to be advisable for the UW’s future, a final decision on the
funding for the new biennium will await word from the legislature, advice from
the campus community, and final action on the budget by the Regents in July.
Sincerely yours,
Richard L. McCormick
President