Reports of the UIF-1 Project Reviews (in order of review date):
These reports are in Adobe Acrobat Reader format. They can only be read and printed using Adobe Acrobat Reader (3.0 or above preferred). If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, it maybe downloaded, free of charge. If you wish to download this free software click here Adobe's Web Site and follow the download installation instructions.
OVERVIEW
Purpose of the review of UIF -1 projects: At the inception of the University
Initiatives Fund program, President McCormick pledged to review the accomplishments
of the funded projects. Assessment is a routine feature of all major initiatives at
the UW, but this was a particularly important commitment because (1) the UIF
projects were encouraged to be especially risk-taking; and (2) this was hard-won
money, taken from existing programs to support these new ventures.
Purpose of the UIF: The University Initiatives Fund (UIF) is intended to enable
the University to seize opportunities at the frontiers of knowledge and learning or
to reshape existing programs to meet with the highest and best needs of the
institution. The fund allows the University to invest in those initiatives that
transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries and to respond to broad institutional
goals. The UIF program has supported a wide range of strategic initiatives that seek
to advance the goals of the institution in tangible and measurable ways. All funded
initiatives are expected to offer significant academic impact or provide
substantially enhanced level of service to academic programs, enhance quality and
excellence, and provide for the long-term significance and sustainability of their
contributions.
Review committees: Review committees consist of two UW faculty and/or staff who
are not directly involved in the project but are in closely related areas.
Additionally, committees include one external reviewer who is judged to be a content
expert. Since three reviewers can in no way be considered to represent all
important stakeholder groups, the intention is that the reviewers will consult
widely with key individuals and groups.
Charge to the review committees: Following their review of written annual
progress reports and 1½ days of consultations, review committees will be asked to:
(1) assess the project’s accomplishments in the context of their original
intentions; (2) provide constructive feedback to project leaders; and (3) make a
recommendation to the President and Provost regarding continuation of funding.
Dissemination of Review Committee Reports: All final reports will be
available on the UIF website .
Comments and Questions: At any point in the process, feel free to direct
comments and questions to Associate Provost Debra Friedman (
debraf@u.washington.edu,
543-6616). 2000-01 UIF-1 Review Process Timeline
Project-specific UIF-1 Reviews*
Offices of the President and Provost
University of Washington
2000-2001
Summer and Fall, 2000 |
Review teams assembled, reviews scheduled (B. Greenwald) |
Fall, 2000 | Preliminary meeting with internal members of the review team (D. Friedman) |
Fall, 2000 | Charge letter and project materials will be distributed to review committee (D. Friedman, B. Greenwald) |
Fall, 2000 and Winter 2001 | Review committee site visits and preliminary recommendations |
Spring 2001 | President and Provost announce outcomes of the reviews |