Skip to content

UW Provost Tricia Serio Visits D.C. to Champion Research Priorities

This week, University of Washington Provost Tricia Serio traveled to Washington, D.C. to meet with senior leaders across multiple federal agencies, including the National Science Foundation (NSF), to advocate for robust federal investment in research and innovation.

As the chief academic officer of one of the nation’s leading public research universities, Provost Serio underscored the vital role that federal research funding plays in advancing scientific discovery, supporting students and faculty, and driving economic growth in Washington state and across the country. Her meetings focused on aligning federal priorities with the university’s research strengths and strategic goals for the upcoming fiscal year. Amid growing uncertainty around federal budget negotiations, Provost Serio emphasized the critical need for sustained investment in university research and explored opportunities for the University of Washington to strengthen its role as a trusted partner to the federal government.

Provost Serio’s visit reflects UW’s ongoing commitment to federal engagement and its leadership in shaping national research policy. By fostering and maintaining strong partnerships with federal agencies, Provost Serio worked to ensure that the UW’s research enterprise remains a powerful engine for innovation and advancement.

Federal Budget Update

The federal government is set to run out of funding at the end of September, leaving Congress just weeks to avoid a shutdown.

Current funding is provided by a continuing resolution (CR) passed in March that extended government operations through the fiscal year. Lawmakers have increasingly relied on CRs in recent years as partisan divisions have made it difficult to pass the 12 annual appropriations bills on time.

Although Republicans control both chambers, deep divisions remain between the House and Senate. Senate Republicans have advanced bipartisan bills that call for tens of billions more in spending than proposals from House Republicans and the Trump administration.

In the House, GOP lawmakers have been drafting bills with steep cuts but are also moving toward another stopgap resolution. Such a measure could extend funding into mid-November, giving negotiators more time to strike a full-year deal for fiscal 2026.

One option gaining traction would combine a short-term CR with several relatively uncontroversial appropriations bills, including Military Construction–VA, Agriculture, and Legislative Branch. Senior appropriators Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) have endorsed the approach, with Cole signaling he wants the CR to run only through Thanksgiving.

Tensions with the White House are complicating talks. The administration’s recent use of the “pocket rescissions” process to cancel billions in foreign aid has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, raising doubts about whether bipartisan agreements will hold.

Meanwhile, appropriators are pressing ahead with their individual bills to show progress. The House is set to take up the Energy-Water bill this week, while the Appropriations Committee will vote on the Financial Services measure. In the Senate, the panel plans to advance Homeland Security and State-Foreign Operations next week.

Less than 13 legislative days remain until the funding deadline, meaning lawmakers will have to act quickly to keep the government open.

 

 

Student Loan Changes

After a marathon of overnight voting and intense intra-party negotiations, the Republican-controlled Congress has passed the long-anticipated “Big, Beautiful Bill” championed by President Trump. The sweeping legislation, signed into law on July 4, introduces significant changes across key policy areas—including taxation, defense, immigration, healthcare, and education.

One of the bill’s most consequential changes involves a complete restructuring of the federal student loan system, aimed at curbing government spending to offset substantial tax reductions. Although initial proposals varied between the House and Senate, lawmakers ultimately reached a compromise that is now law.

New Borrowing Limits (Effective July 1, 2026):

  • Graduate students: $20,500 annually, $100,000 lifetime cap
  • Professional students: $50,000 annually, $200,000 lifetime cap
  • Parents (combined per student): $20,000 annually, $65,000 lifetime cap
  • Lifetime borrowing cap for all students: $257,000
  • Grad PLUS and Parent PLUS programs: Eliminated
  • Undergraduate annual borrowing limits: Unchanged

Repayment Changes: Starting July 1, 2026, all existing income-driven repayment (IDR) plans will be discontinued for new borrowers. Instead, two new plans will be introduced:

  1. Standard Repayment Plan: Payment periods range from 10 to 25 years, depending on the original loan balance
  2. Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP): Payments set at 1% to 10% of income, with remaining balance forgiven after 30 years

Current borrowers can remain on existing repayment plans through July 1, 2028, after which they will be transitioned to RAP or a revised version of the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan.

See the table below for more:

OBBBA Student Loan Chart

“Big, Beautiful Bill” Passes Senate

After a record-breaking vote-a-rama lasting over 24 hours, the U.S. Senate has passed President Trump’s expansive tax and spending reconciliation package — a major step toward his goal of signing the legislation into law by July 4. The bill encompasses the majority of the President’s legislative agenda.

The final vote was 51–50, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. Republican Senators Susan Collins (ME), Thom Tillis (NC), and Rand Paul (KY) joined all Senate Democrats in opposing the measure. Senators Collins and Tillis cited the bill’s Medicaid cuts and their potential impact on rural hospitals as key reasons for their “no” votes. A proposed amendment from Collins to establish a rural hospital stabilization fund failed in a procedural vote Tuesday morning. Tillis recently announced his decision to retire at the end of his term after facing political fallout from President Trump over his earlier vote against the motion to proceed.

For much of the overnight session, the bill’s fate remained in doubt. Republican leadership engaged in extensive negotiations with undecided senators, both behind closed doors and on the Senate floor. Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski (AK), who had withheld support for much of the process, ultimately voted in favor after securing Alaska-specific carve-outs from certain provisions in the legislation.

The legislative battle now shifts to the House of Representatives, where Speaker Mike Johnson is expected to bring the bill to a vote as early as Wednesday. The initial version of the package narrowly passed the House, where Republicans hold only a slim majority. Several members have already expressed concern over changes made by the Senate.

The conservative wing of the House GOP — particularly the House Freedom Caucus — has objected to the bill’s suspension of the debt ceiling and what it views as insufficient spending reductions. The House GOP’s budget plan called for $2 trillion in spending reductions to match $4.5 trillion in tax cuts. The Senate bill cuts just over $1.5 trillion but spends the full amount on taxes.

Meanwhile, more moderate Republicans have raised alarms over the deep Medicaid cuts included in the Senate-passed version. Senate Republicans approved a $1 trillion cut to Medicaid, which is far harsher than the original House plan.

Members of the House have been called back to Washington from their July 4 recess to begin consideration of the revised legislation. While its final passage remains uncertain, Speaker Johnson and President Trump have demonstrated a strong ability to unify their caucus in the past.

The Office of Federal Relations will continue to monitor developments and provide updates as this process unfolds.

Byrd Bath Strikes Medicaid Proposals

In yet another setback for Senate Republicans, the Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that several key Medicaid provisions in the GOP’s sweeping budget reconciliation bill violate the Byrd Rule, effectively stripping them from the legislation.

The Byrd Rule, a procedural safeguard named after the late Senator Robert Byrd, restricts what can be included in budget reconciliation bills. It prohibits provisions that are considered “extraneous” to the federal budget, meaning they must primarily affect government spending or revenue and not merely serve policy goals.

Among the provisions deemed to be in violation of the Byrd Rule are restrictions on pharmacy benefit managers and ACA subsidies for certain immigrants as well as, perhaps most importantly, limits on Medicaid provider taxes, which are state-imposed taxes on healthcare providers that are then used to draw down more federal Medicaid funding.

The Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, proposed lowering the provider tax cap to 3.5% of net patient revenue over the next 6 years in Medicaid-expansion states, and barring non-expansion states from raising provider taxes beyond their current levels.

According to the Congressional Budget Office, this proposal would save the government hundreds of billions of dollars over the next 10 years. Hospitals around the country, however, warned that this could devastate rural and underserved hospitals that rely heavily on Medicaid funding. The potential impacts of Medicaid cuts were a point of contention within the Senate GOP, with members such as Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Susan Collins (R-ME) voicing concerns over the cuts.
Republicans will now have to work to rewrite these provisions to be Byrd Rule compliant if they wish to keep them in the bill. While they do have the option to overrule the Parliamentarian, this move is controversial, and Majority Leader John Thune has said that it is not on the table.
With the self-imposed July 4th deadline for sending the “Big, Beautiful Bill” to President Trump’s desk looming, Senate Republicans will be scrambling over the weekend to make crucial decisions on the future of the Medicaid portion of this bill. If it does manage to pass the Senate, its chances of success are still wary in the House, where many members are unhappy with Senate changes.
The Federal Relations Office will keep you updated with changes as the process unfolds.