Skip to content

House Appropriations Committee to Consider Interior and Labor-H

The House keeps up the pace with considering the annual 12 appropriations bills. Today the House Appropriations committee put out a notice that they would consider two bills next week.

The whole House Appropriations Committee will consider the FY2016 Interior and Environment Appropriations bill on Tuesday, June 16 at 10:15 am.

The House Labor, Health and Human Services and Education subcommittee has issued a notice for a mark up of the FY16 Labor-HHS-Education (Labor-H) appropriations bill on Wednesday, June 17 at 9 am.

The House Appropriations Committee has passed seven bills out of committee this year thus far. Bills that are expected shortly are the FY16 bills for Agriculture, Homeland Security, and Finanical Services bills have yet to be considered in any capacity.

 

 

 

House Passes FY16 Defense Appropriations Bill

Today, the House  approved the $578.6 billion FY15 Defense appropriations bill despite Democratic objections, both from the House and White House, to using the war accounts, known as the Overseas Contingency Operations fund, to bridge the gap between stringent BCA budget caps and the Pentagon’s spending request. The measure totals $800 million above the Administration’s request, thanks to the additional war funds.

The largely party line vote of 278 to 149 on the typically bipartisan measure (HR 2685) underscores the divide over the use of the Overseas Contingency Operations fund.

In addition, AAU has issued a statement against the measure due to the proposed cuts in basic research.

OMB Letter of Concern to House Appropriators about FY16 CJS

As this process gets ever more interesting, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Sean Donovan sent a letter to House Appropriations Committee’s Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Ranking Member Nita Lowey (D-NY) about the draft FY16 CJS Appropriations bill. The letter expressed strong concern on the funding levels for science and innovation due to the adherence of the committee to the Sequestration framework levels. The Committee is expected to mark up the bill this morning.

The letter says in part:

“Its shortsighted funding cuts undermine both fiscal responsibility and economic competitiveness, since they would prevent investments that both reduce future costs to taxpayers and inform business decision making, improve weather forecasting, support business expansion into new markets, and spur development of innovative technologies.”

Read the letter here.

 

House Passes Conference Committee Budget

The House of Representatives approved the FY16 budget resolution conference report (SConRes 11) with a vote of 226-197, sending the measure to the Senate for final approval. The measure provides overall guidance for spending but is not signed into law by the President. The FY16 agreement follows the spending caps enacted in the Budget Control Act for both defense and non-defense discretionary spending in FY16, but it bolsters defense spending by using the Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) fund, which does not count against the spending caps. The measure provides $96 billion for the OCO in FY16, or $38 billion more than the President requested.

The conference agreement authorizes the use of the expedited reconciliation process only for making changes to or repealing the Affordable Care Act.

FY16 Budget Conference Committee Resolution

Late yesterday, House and Senate conferees released SConRes 21 – the Budget Resolution for FY 2016, which is the conference agreement for the FY16 Budget. As a reminder, the Conferenced budget is not law. While it is not signed by the President, the measure does bind the House and Senate on policy and spending directives for the current fiscal year and into the future effectually carrying the force of law.

As a note, the work of Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and Congressman Paul Ryan (R-MN) lead to the enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act in December 2013. That law rolled back and replaced a portion of the sequester of discretionary spending required by the 2011 Budget Control Act for FY 2014 and FY 2015 and thereby enabled Congress to later enact omnibus appropriations packages for those two years.

The House is expected to consider the measure today, and it is expected to pass.

The measure’s FY 2016 discretionary spending adheres to the sequester-reduced defense and non-defense caps set by the Budget Control Act but also includes more funds for defense for FY 2016 through the uncapped OCO account and proposes to add extra funds to that account through FY 2021. It assumes an extra $245 billion for defense over 10 years while cutting non-defense spending below sequester-reduced levels by $496 billion.

It proposes $4.2 trillion in reductions to mandatory programs over 10 years, calls for a deficit-neutral overhaul of the tax code that lowers rates and assumes $124 billion in additional savings through “dynamic scoring” through Fair Value Accounting. This accounting measure is concerning because it changes fundamental assumptions of the costs of major programs like Pell and student loans. The measure’s FY 2016 discretionary spending adheres to the sequester-reduced defense and non-defense caps set by the Budget Control Act, but also includes more funds for defense for FY 2016 through the uncapped OCO account and proposes to add extra funds to that account through FY 2021. It assumes an extra $245 billion for defense over 10 years while cutting non-defense spending below sequester-reduced levels by $496 billion.

The agreement calls for a balanced budget by FY 2024, entirely by reducing spending $5.3 trillion over the next 10 years. Funding would be reduced though:

  •  instructions to House and Senate committees with oversight over the health care law to trigger the budget reconciliation process to try to repeal that law,
  • reducing spending on Medicare and Medicaid
  • changing programs such as food stamps.

For higher ed specifically:

  • The budget eliminates all mandatory Pell funding, assumes the maximum grant will be frozen at the current level and be fully funded on the discretionary side.  This purportedly would achieve a $84.6 billion in savings (Mandatory Pell funding is $73.9 billion over ten years, plus another $10.7 billion of mandatory spending already provided to support the discretionary grant.)
  • Eliminates in-school subsidies for undergraduate Stafford loans.  (Saving $34.8 billion.)
  • Eliminates public sector loan forgiveness. (Saving $10.5 billion.)
  • Eliminates expansion of Income Based Repayment programs. (Saving $16.3 billion.)

The Budget Committee’s switch to Fair Value accounting, would make student loans appear vastly more expensive to the federal government than they are – $223 billion more expensive from this year through 2024. Previously, student loans were seen as assets that made money for the federal government.