Skip to content

News and updates

Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court upheld a broad conception of birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump’s executive order declaring that children born in the US are not American citizens if their parents were here illegally or temporarily.

“Citizenship, then and now, was the right to have rights—to freely participate in our political community. The Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment extended that promise to ‘every free-born person in this land,’” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court, citing congressional debate over the amendment, “We keep that promise today.”

Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorusch, and Samuel Alito dissented. Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the court’s majority to strike down the executive order but said he based his decision on a federal law, not the Constitution. Back in April, Trump attended the oral arguments for this case, Trump v. Barbara, becoming the first sitting president ever to do so. The Court was expected to uphold birthright citizenship, but the final ruling was closer than predicted, with most expecting a 7-2 ruling.

The decision is one of several key rulings released over the past week:

  • In a 6-3 decision, the Court upheld state laws barring transgender girls and women from playing on school athletic teams, ruling that state bans in Idaho and West Virginia don’t violate the Constitution or Title IX.
  • In a 6-3 decision, the Court expanded the power of the executive branch to fire independent regulators, with the notable exception of members of the Federal Reserve. Despite allowing Fed governor Lisa Cook to stay in her role, this ruling increases the power of the president to fire agency heads at will.
  • In a 5-4 decision, the Court upheld Mississippi’s grace period for late mail-in ballots, rejecting Trump’s persistent attempts to invalidate ballots arriving after Election Day. This ruling is significant for protecting mail-in voting across 2026 battleground districts. Over half of states permit mailed ballots to be counted a certain number of days after the election, if they are postmarked by Election Day.
  • In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court erased party spending limits in federal elections, striking down a federal election law more than 50 years old.
  • Also in a 6-3 decision, the Court ruled the Trump administration may end legal protections for migrants fleeing violence in Haiti and Syria, allowing DHS to end the temporary protected status program.

Judge Freezes Trump Rule Limiting Graduate Student Loan Access

Late Wednesday night, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from implementing a new rule that would cap federal student loans for graduate students. The new rule was set to take effect on July 1. U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell sided with eight trade organizations, including the American Association of Nurse Practitioners and the PA Education Association, who brought the suit against the Education Department.

The Education Department published the rule on May 1, attempting to implement the federal student loan changes that were part of Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act. This included eliminating Grad PLUS loans, and setting loan limits for graduate/professional degrees, as well as altering the regulatory definition of what is considered “a professional degree” to only cover certain degrees in 11 fields.

The preliminary injunction applies to this definition of professional degrees component, and as of now, the July 1 deadline for the new caps is blocked.

House Markups Continue

Appropriations season is in full swing for FY27, with the House Appropriations Committee recently passing several of the 12 funding bills. As of today, the following bills have passed through full committee:

  • Agriculture-Rural Development-FDA
  • Transportation-HUD
  • Labor-HHS-Education
  • Homeland Security
  • Interior-Environment
  • Legislative Branch
  • Energy-Water
  • Military Construction-Veteran Affairs
  • Commerce-Justice-Science
  • Financial Services and General Government
  • National Security-SFOPS

Republican leadership postponed Senate markups, which were scheduled to start last week, citing an inability to reach an agreement with Democrats on topline funding levels.

Our appropriations tracker is updated with the most recent funding numbers as of June 10.

White House Proposes New Rules on Research Grant Approvals

The White House released draft regulations yesterday that aim to centralize Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control over the release of government funds, including scientific research grants.

If enacted, the proposal would dramatically change the peer review process, giving senior political appointees final say over approvals.

Section 200.205 states that “consistent with the Executive order, senior appointees must conduct these reviews and apply specific principles when evaluating proposals. These principles include ensuring that discretionary awards advance the President’s policy priorities, prohibit the use of funds for discriminatory or otherwise impermissible purposes, and emphasize ensuring compliance with applicable law.” This section refers to President Trump’s August 7 Executive Order regarding oversight of federal grantmaking.

The proposal states that the scientific peer review of research proposals “remains advisory and does not replace agency discretion.”

The proposed OMB rule would not affect the indirect costs rate, which the administration had previously tried to cap at 15% last year.

ED Publishes “Living Document” on OBBB Implementation

The Department of Education (ED) has published a “living document” with Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and information on virtual office hours to support HR 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (P.L.119-21) (OBBB).

The first round of FAQs on student loan reforms is posted. The Department considers the FAQs to be a living document and will continue to post new and updated FAQs as they become available.