Skip to content

News and updates

AAU Details Higher Education and Research Provisions of Economic Recovery Package

The Association of American Universities (AAU) has prepared a grid (link below) that details the final higher education and research provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The grid breaks funding out by agency account, and also provides a comparison of the House and Senate bills that led to the final conference agreement. As has been mentioned, we will be soliciting information from the federal agencies on exactly which programs — within the accounts detailed — will be impacted by the funding provided in the package.

AAU Economic Recovery Package Funding Chart (click here)

President Signs Economic Recovery Package as Agencies Prepare

Today, President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. As previously discussed on this site, the legislation provides critical funding for research and student aid. Additionally, assistance is included for state governments so that they are able to lessen the severity of cuts to education and other critical services.

At present, the federal agencies are preparing details on their plans to implement the provisions of the package. For example, on Wednesday February 18th, NIH will hold a public briefing to provide details on its planned use of $10 billion provided in stimulus. Preliminary reports indicate that NSF and NIH will fund existing applications at higher rates as opposed to issuing many new RFPs. The Office of Federal Relations will provide agency and program specific information as it is made available, likely over the course of the next week.

Brookings Institution Releases Energy R&D Proposal

Last week, the Brookings Institution released a proposal to establish a network of regional energy discovery and innovation institutes (e-DIIs). According to the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program, the e-DIIs would support the overarching goals of renewing America’s economy, promoting energy independence, and addressing climate change. Cities that are currently leaders in innovation, like Seattle, would serve as natural fits for an e-DII. The regional centers would be funded through the Department of Energy and operate as hubs of a distributed research network, linking the nation’s top scientists, engineers, and research facilities. The proposal, Energy Discovery-Innovation Institutes: A Step toward America’s Energy Sustainability, was drafted through a collaborative effort led by James Duderstadt, president emeritus at the University of Michigan. The central idea put forward in the proposal joins the nation’s major research universities with federal and corporate research and development laboratories. More specifically, the e-DIIs would:

  • Foster partnerships to pursue cutting-edge applications oriented to research among multiple participants and disciplines;
  • Develop and rapidly transfer highly innovative technologies into the marketplace; 
  • Build the knowledge base and human capital necessary to address the nation’s energy challenges; and 
  • Encourage regional economic development by spawning clusters of nearby start-up firms, private research organizations, suppliers, and other complementary groups and businesses.

According to the working group that assembled the proposal, the federal government should establish several dozen eDIIs at an annual cost of $6 billion or up to $200 million per competitively awarded eDII. The group anticipates that federal investments would be augmented by funding from academia, state governments, and industry. The February 9th rollout of the Brookings’ proposal, attended by leaders froma academia, industry, and government, demonstrated the widespread recognition of the need for increased federal investments in energy research and development.  Panelists and presenters included: William Bates, Council on Competitiveness; John Denniston, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers; Billy M. Glover, Boeing Commercial Airplanes; Peter McPherson, National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges; Michael Shellenberger, Breakthrough Institute; Howard Berke, Konarka Technologies Inc.; William Harris, Science Foundation Arizona; Jeffrey Wadsworth, Battelle Memorial Institute; Keith W. Cooley; NextEnergy; E. Gordon Gee, The Ohio State University; Michael Crow, Arizona State University, and U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH).

The Obama administration has clearly stated a desire to increase federal investments in energy research and development. The recently passed stimulus package includes $2 billion for related research activities and serves as an example of the focus that we can expect from administration. However, the funding level proposed in the Brookings proposal remains a heavy lift. In the coming days and weeks, we can expect to get a sense of how feasible the Brookings plan is, as federal agencies begin to detail exactly how they plan to spend the billions of dollars of research funding contained in the economic recovery package, and as a Fiscal Year 2010 budget request is finalized and presented to Congress in the spring.

A full transcript of the event, audio/video recordings, and presentations are available on the Brookings website (click here).

Senator Cantwell Picked to Head Energy Subcommittee

The scope of the subcommittee includes such issues as climate change and renewable energy. Senator Cantwell intends to focus much of the subcommittee’s efforts on advancing clean energy initiatives. According to a news release from the Senator’s office, “Renewable energy, smart grid technologies, research at national labs, energy market regulation and nuclear waste cleanup are among my top priorities as the new chairwoman of the Energy Subcommittee. Transitioning to a clean energy system is a key component of our economic recovery, and I am anxious to continue working with members of the Energy Subcommittee and green energy technology leaders to move America toward this new clean energy future.”

Economic Recovery Package Finalized

House and Senate negotiators have finalized an economic recovery package conference report, which passed the House on a largely party-line vote Friday afternoon and will pass the Senate in the late evening. The $787 billion package includes significant funding for research and student aid, but does not provide resources desired specifically for higher education infrastructure projects.

For research, the economic recovery package will include (but is not limited to): $3 billion for the National Science Foundation; $2 billion for the Department of Energy Office of Science ($1.6 billion for science, $400 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy); $10 billion for the National Institutes of Health; $830 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; $1 billion for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and $2.5 billion for energy efficiency and renewable energy research. On the education front, the final package includes a $500 increase for the Pell maximum as well as a new $2,500 education tax credit, of which 40 percent would be refundable. The final agreement will also add $200 million for the work-study program.

The economic recovery package will provide $53.6 billion for a State Fiscal Stabilization Fund. Of the total provided for the fund, approximately $39.5 billion is dedicated to public education, both K-12 and higher education. A new provision includes early childhood education programs, “as applicable,” as well. Infrastructure projects are permissible under the stabilization fund. However, competing budget priorities at the state level will pose a challenge for such projects. The bill also provides for nearly $8.8 billion to states for “other government services,” which could be used to support higher education.

A copy of the bill as well as the notes explaining the provisions are available at the following web addresses: http://appropriations.house.gov/ or http://www.rules.house.gov/. In the coming days, the Office of Federal Relations will provide analyses of the legislation, including details on what the appropriated funding means specifically for the state of Washington.