During this morning’s live chat, I answered the following question incorrectly —
“Why would the UW cut fundraising staff during a time of constrained resources? They bring money in.”
Fundraising staff was cut, but the reason was not the current budget — it was a response to the severe drop in the stock market which dramatically reduced our endowment income.
Sorry for any confusion and thanks again to everyone who participated in the live chat.
Randy Hodgins, Director of the Office of State Relations, held a live chat from 10 am to 11 am on April 2, 2009 regarding the state budget and other key issues in Olympia. See below for the live chat transcript:
Both House and Senate Capital Budget writers released their proposals and both find construction projects at the UW scaled back. The House version contains fewer projects (for example no funding for the UW Tacoma Joy Building project) and transfers all UW building account money to the general fund. Because of the use of transfers from the capital budget to the operating budget, a smaller project list was expected, but we will be working with lawmakers to address specific concerns raised by the proposals. As with the operating budgets, negotiators from both Houses are meeting to work out differences.
A final reminder, please join me tomorrow at 10 a.m. for a live chat on budget issues, here on the blog.
We’ve had a chance to review the Senate and House budget proposals in more detail — here are some basics:
The House cut the UW budget $261 million, compared to $189 million for the Senate and $116 for the Governor’s proposal. The House allows tuition increases up to 10% (compared to 7% for the Senate and Governor), but it allows less flexibility in how to cut and requires that enrollments be maintained and that graduation rates be maintained in high demand fields. Raises for all state employees and teachers were put on hold.
Community colleges were cut less than four year school. Of the four-year schools, the UW received the largest cut (31% from its maintenance level — that’s the level that would have been needed to carry forward all programs at the same level as last biennium).
Here is a link to a statement posted by President Emmert on his blog.
Also, here is a sampling of this mornings budget coverage from the Seattle Times, Tacoma News Tribune, Olympian, and Everett Herald.
The Seattle Times also has an editorial this morning calling for increased tuition to mitigate higher education cuts.
The capital budget proposal will be released later today and we will have an update as it becomes available.
Also, remember that tomorrow from 10 am to 11 am I will be here for a live chat on the budget — what it means and where the process goes from here. I hope you will join us.
This Thursday morning from 10 to 11 am I will be conducting a live online chat about the budget situation. Come to the blog at that time where you can submit your questions, read answers, and see the comments of your fellow community members. You can enter your email in the live chat box on the blog for a reminder. This will be a first for us, but we hope it is a way to get more information to the university community and to help you get your questions and concerns addressed.
House budget writers have released their operating budget proposal and as rumored it cuts higher education deeper than the Senate version released yesterday. Tuition is allowed to rise 10 percent under the House approach, but even with that the overall reduction is much larger. We will have more specifics later — for now, here are stories on the House proposal from the Seattle Times and SeattlePI.com.
Here is some more coverage of and reaction to the state Senate budget proposal.
The Spokesman Review (Spokane)
House Democrats are scheduled to release their operating budget proposal tomorrow morning at 10:00. We will have details of the key differences here as they become available.
One way to lessen the effect of dramatic budget cuts on students (fewer classes, fewer enrollments) would be to raise tuition above the 7% planned increase. But the question then becomes: how would a larger tuition increase affect the out-of-pocket costs that students must pay? Our Office of Planning and Budgeting has put together an analysis of the effect of a 14% tuition increase ($875 per year) on the net costs paid by students.
Because of increased financial aid and increased federal tax credits, students with a family income below $160,000 would see no increase in net costs. You can find a chart on the issue here.
President Emmert has released the following statement on the state Senate budget proposal:
The budget presented today by the state Senate is deeply disturbing. Cuts of this magnitude would seriously damage the UW’s ability to serve the state. The Senate’s budget would reduce the number of students admitted to the university at a time when we have the largest demand in history. The budget cuts would also force students to take longer to graduate because many fewer courses would be available for them. They would also mean a large number of layoffs and job eliminations, probably impacting more than 1,000 UW staff.
It is particularly disappointing that the Senate budget does not include greater increases in tuition to help offset some of the cuts. Higher tuition levels would allow the UW and the rest of higher education to avoid cutting admissions and courses. Federal increases in Pell grants and tuition tax credits make higher tuition affordable for many students and families. By not allowing more flexibility on tuition the Senate proposal blocks the UW, and the rest of higher education, from helping students and the State. When combined with these very deep budget cuts, the result is a huge step backward for Washington.
In the coming weeks as the legislature debates the budget, we will be working hard to reduce the level of the budget cuts and convince legislators that higher tuition is affordable and essential. This is a task that will demand all of our collective efforts.
We expect to have more on the budget proposal and its implications later today.
Senate budget writers have unveiled their operating budget proposal and as expected it contains major cuts in higher education. We are reviewing the numbers and will be posting more analysis and reaction here later today. For now, here is a link to the official legislative budget page, which contains a highlights package as well as a link to the Seattle Times story on the announcement.